Future-Proofing: 10 Ways to Survive as a Writer

There is a growing concern across many industries to prepare for the future, to be ready for the onslaught of change. While this is by no means a new concern – look, for instance, at the Y2K scare, wherein people were afraid of technology not being ‘future ready’ – it is certainly prevalent in modern society and the contemporary workplace.

One surprising sector that is affected by the changing tides of the future, and one near to my heart, is that of the writer, the artist, the creator. How will we manage if all physical objects are torn from our grasp and we must exist in the Digital Space forever more? I don’t think writers and creators are going anywhere fast, but it is true that we should be adapting to the market and environment around us.

In the future, all writers will be made of circuitry

In the future, all writers will be made of circuitry

Here, then, are 10 tips on how to make it in the future as a writer.

  1. Live performance will never die. We love to see something performed in front of us.

  2. If people like you, they’ll probably support your work.

  3. Poetry is timeless, and currently a growing market.

  4. Print out drafts of your work and store them. It’ll be nice to look back on your time as a writer after the apocalypse.

  5. Keep an eye on the bestseller list: it’s good to know what people are buying.

  6. Learn from feedback. If people have comments, heed them.

  7. Don’t heed all the comments you hear: some people are idiots.

  8. There will always be jobs you can do alongside writing. Earning a living isn’t admitting defeat.

  9. Be flexible, allowing yourself to move with the waves of time.

  10. Don’t be too flexible. Know what you’re good at and find a market for it.

You may realise that some of these contradict one another, or don’t really make sense. That is because no one really knows what’s coming around the corner, so we do our best to hunker down and prepare, but we know that a surprise change blows that all to smoke. Even the experts are guessing. So maybe these tips will help you in the future, or perhaps they will become as obsolete as a VHS: only time will tell.

Schmooze With Me

Networking. A word to strike fear in the hearts of introverts everywhere. It sounds like robots in a room together, linking their synapses and transferring data. It sounds heartless.

A business meeting. The horror.

A business meeting. The horror.

It is somewhat heartless, but then again, so is everything it represents; psychopaths often make excellent businesspeople. The world of networking, of worming your way to the top through whatever means necessary, is a harsh one. It rewards those who disregard social boundaries, who leap into conversations headfirst, who are ‘masters of communication management’ (Babiak & Hare, 2006).

So business, and by extension a networking event, favours the extroverted. The ideal schmoozing socialite is an outgoing performative type. Pity the poor introvert, the orbiting Pluto of the party, on the outer rim by the drinks table trying to engage someone whilst simultaneously avoiding eye contact like the plague.

I have excellent news for you, fellow introverted creatives, fellow reluctant networkers. It may be in vain, after all. Perhaps the best course of action is to stay home and work, not to go and sip a buck’s fizz and stand awkwardly while a man much bolder than you talks to a marketing executive.

In a world in which we interact ever more frequently with our peers and potential business and personal partners online, the introvert can thrive. Able to draft and redraft responses and avoid the throng of hundreds of data-hungry robots in a conference hall, online communication holds many advantages as the networking pathway of the future.

Besides, tweeting at potential collaborators doesn’t feel, to put it bluntly, dirty in the same way that networking does. That isn’t just a turn of phrase, either. A study found that people really feel dirty after ‘instrumental networking’ and literally value soap 19% higher after such an activity. We have a physically and psychologically negative response to networking, they ‘impinge on an individual’s moral purity’ (Casciaro et al, 2014), so why bother? We are told that it’s essential to succeed, but that is not necessarily the case.

It seems that, actually, no one mixes at mixers. Research suggests that most people just talk to the others they already know at events, mingling among their circles and not forming new connections at all. This feels somewhat counter-intuitive and, I would argue, fails to fulfil on the basic point of networking events. People in this study ‘were much more likely to encounter their pre-mixer friends, even though they overwhelmingly stated before the event that their goal was to meet new people’ (Ingram & Morris, 2007).

What conclusion can be drawn from this for the introverted creative? Poet alex d r horn has some closing thoughts:

if studies are to be trusted

reliable confidants as they are

then we need not bother

leaving the house

sipping cocktails

with coat-tails

better surely to stay home

and tweet your desires into the void.

Our Love for the Tactile: A Dialogue

alex d r horn has found the time in their schedule to join the blogger Alex Horn in a discussion about our love of the physical, the concrete nature of reading and the persistence of zines. To distinguish between the two, alex has insisted they be presented in italics because they, and I quote, ‘am not straight and so neither is my type.’ Thus, let us begin the parley.

Zines are here to stay. Even in the face of the digital age and the changing methods through which we engage with media, zines are still incredibly popular. In fact, though print magazine sales have dropped by almost half in the past 6 years, zines are still growing and becoming more successful, with dedicated events and shops popping up all over the world such as Bird in the Hand Zine Shop in Newcastle, Australia, and the Bristol Comic & Zine Fair. Why, alex, do you think this is?

there’s something about touching,

about holding in the palm of your hand

the object

the relic

the real.

it tells us a story. it calls us

to the fireside and says in

concrete papery unmoving tones

‘this is it. this is the sign

you were waiting for.’

you revisit the zine as a pilgrim

to the bathroom after a vindaloo

its permanence pleases you.

there will always be ‘the great escape’

on around christmastime;

there will always be the

zines on your shelf.

So the consistency in the physical is important to the consumer. This is shown in the statistics, actually. We are falling on the side of the tactile and print book sales are continuing to rise, despite the boom of ebooks in the late 00s.

But then zines aren’t mainstream: by design they serve counter-cultures and minority groups who often don’t get representation elsewhere. These stats show society as a whole but not the niche groups perhaps. These groups, these cultures, often seek representation online as well, however. Instagram poetry has emerged for young, often unheard voices to blossom on an accessible, instantly sharable platform. Some are, of course, skeptical, but could this rise mean the end of zines?

the zine feeds from the grasses

of twitter, drinks

from the river of instagram

and when it dies

its body dissolves

becomes mulch

which itself sinks

into the earth and seeps,

like a spilled wine on a white

tablecloth, back online.

the cycle continues.

the eye goes around.

The system keeps itself alive, both organisms cohabiting, benefiting one another. Book deals are being secured from lucrative Instagram poetry accounts (see Rupi Kaur’s two collections) and zines and their creators more often than not have an online presence (there are, at the time of writing, over 820,000 posts on Instagram with #zine. So zines are staying, as we can see, and it’s good to know that low-cost, personal work is still thriving. Any final thoughts, alex?

buy my zine

coming soon.

The alex/Alex Conundrum

I would like to introduce you to alex, who capital letters forgot. 

They are a poet and performer and they controls the keyboard of this very laptop, on which I write to you now, whenever the mood takes them. Often that’s at odd times in the night, or in coffee shops on miserable afternoons. They differ from me, especially in the way they portray themselves to the outside world, greatly. They’re an idealised version of the real, seminar-attending, employment-fulfilling, toilet-going Alex who composes this post now. I do so to explain myself: to explain the distance between the two versions, and yet also the closeness of these writer-personas.

It is not uncommon to have an author persona. In fact, many would suggest it is inevitable; even if an author does not take on a pseudonym, there is still the self who writes and the self who does everything else: the publicity, the meetings, the taxes. As Margaret Atwood elucidates in Negotiating with the Dead, “All writers are double, for the simple reason that you can never actually meet the author of the book you have just read.” Time, Atwood says, gets in the way. We all grow and are no longer the person who wrote that book, that poem, that article. In the same way that Hyde was around last night: this morning, you have Jekyll.

alex existed last night, when they penned a poem, but Alex has woken up this morning and they left a glass of wine half-drunk on the floor by the bed. Having alex in the room is like having a hamster with thumbs let loose from its cage, if the hamster could occasionally empty a bottle and write some dramatic monologue or a terrible joke disguised as poetry. It’s an enjoyable experience for the most part, to have company, not to feel so terribly alone, but cleaning up the mess and editing drafts of scripts emerging from the subconscious is odious and tiresome. 

I think the hamster analogy may have escaped my grasp. Besides, it’s something alex would write: it’s ridiculous.

Throughout literature, throughout history, doubles have personified an internal struggle. Romulus and Remus or Cain and Abel fought for dominance. All I can hope is that alex is not trying to oust me from my spot as the one who walks around during the day. I’m happy to continue with the current arrangement, they’re a better writer and story-teller than I: they don’t blog, for a start. To be frank, I think they’re too lazy to deal with the day-to-day nonsense of living, so I’m probably safe for now.

Having said all that, is Alex really that different from alex? Are we not one? Do we not inhabit the same space, the same atoms? We are, we do. Is it not problematic to suggest some split in my psyche, that I can’t write unless I become them? ‘A great poet, a really great poet, is the most unpoetical of all creatures,’ Lord Henry states in The Picture of Dorian Grey. And perhaps that’s the crux of it: people are complex and nuanced. And that’s why I’d like to introduce you to alex, who capital letters forgot, who I have been all along.


Blogger's Block

On finding yourself in the unique position of having a blog and not knowing what to write for it.

I’m extremely fortunate: I have a position of great privilege afforded me by my nationality, my race, my sex, my class and even my education. I get to study creative writing, spend my time reading and writing, a thing many people would give an arm to have the spare time for. 

As part of this education, I have to start up a blog and post at least once a week. That seems fair, entirely normal, keeping up-to-date on the trends of well-known writers such as Neil Gaiman who regularly blog about the goings-on in their lives or the writer-world they inhabit.

And that sounds like a good thing to do. It sounds important: building an image of myself as a would-be professional with my own website and interesting things to say. But for one fundamental flaw: I don’t have interesting things to say.

I could tell you all about the dissertation I am writing, about the intricacies of making characters and weaving them into retellings of Cornish history and Celtic myths, but I can’t show you any of the work so it remains completely without context. I could tell you about the books I’ve read, about the poems I’ve devoured, but they don’t relate to my ‘craft’ (a requisite part of the assessment criteria for this blog).

Instead I’m left with a blog post vacuously exploring the emptiness of my creativity. I feel like a failure. But, ‘failure is just another name for much of real life,’ as Margaret Atwood wrote, and so here I am writing a blog about the existence of the blog. Writing a post about knowing not what to write for the post.

I’m to write about my ‘craft’. Well, what is that? I write primarily for performance, my words are to be spoken aloud; performance poetry, podcasts, radio plays, theatre. Perhaps, then, that is why I struggle to commit code to page in this purely written form. Perhaps I have lost the playfulness of the spoken in exchange for the literal black-and-white of the page.

That, at least, explains something about my craft, does it not? At least acknowledging that I don’t have any ideas gives me an idea, learning nothing about blogging teaches me something about myself. And maybe next week I’ll have something better to say, but for now all I can do is be grateful for the ability to write, to do something I love, and to be able to fail sometimes (a lot of the time) and ‘get back on the horse that threw you, as they used to say. They also used to say: you learn as much from failure as you learn from success.’

Persistence is what will drive me through, as it always has. The persistence to get back on the horse, the persistence to generate content, the persistence to get out of bed in the morning. Persistence is a skill you learn through desperation. Being desperate to write, to produce, to create, leads to this blog, to this education and – hopefully somewhere down the line – to a job doing those things.

Listen Up: Eavesdropping for Realistic Dialogue

Good dialogue is often real, great dialogue is often stolen. Using real people’s words to form actual lines is a time-honoured tradition, and has worked for many successful writers. It is also a well-worn writing exercise for budding creatives: go out into the great wide world and listen to what everyone is saying out there.

When I was at school, in an A-Level Creative Writing workshop, we were sent out of the classroom, pen in hand, to go to the canteen and jot down what the rest of the school was saying. This sounds like a great opportunity to learn about the inhabitants of a run-of-the-mill school in south-east England, except for the fact that this was at 10am. There was no one in the canteen, obviously.

Instead we bunked off and went to the common room. That sounds bad but I ended up hearing far more voices there than I would have doing the exercise we were told to do. Granted, I didn’t write anything down, but I was 16, what did you expect?

The point of this, however, is that the activity – if actually carried out – is a simple but effective one. Anyone can do it. Anyone should do it. You should do it. Should you?

The questionable ethics of listening in to other people’s conversations is a valid concern. Though not a crime in the UK, at least according to Rupert Murdoch but not Andy Coulson (see the News of the World scandal <https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/jun/24/phone-hacking-scandal-timeline-trial>), there is a line to be drawn when it comes to eavesdropping. No one wants to be taken to court over the desire to obtain realistic dialogue.

Similarly, we might hear some things we don’t want to. I was once on a rather crowded train to Nottingham next to a woman loudly and proudly breaking up with her boyfriend of several years. While that would make for a great story and certainly makes for an amusing party anecdote, it might be best to avoid lifting straight from her words – if only for the sake of keeping the dialogue clean.

So, wading through the potentially troubling ethics of using other people’s words in our work, how does one go about effectively eavesdropping? Luckily, there is a ridiculously illustrated WikiHow article on some questionable methods (<https://www.wikihow.com/Eavesdrop>). However, if you want a simpler and more specifically writer-focussed way, I’ve got you covered.

Step 1: Bring a notebook and pen. 

Your phone could work perfectly well here, and may be subtler when you jot down something someone’s said, but I find having a dedicated, discreet notebook works best. I probably write about as fast as I type on my phone, and having a specific location for these overhead snippets means I’m not flicking through my phone at the drop of a hat, trying to recall exactly what I just heard. The book is there, open, with my pen nearby.

Step 2: Get out there.

Obviously, you’re going to want to be in public. I got most of my best quotes on public transport, but other writers work best elsewhere: in pubs, at the gym, at cafes (<https://alanrinzler.com/2010/05/the-writers-toolkit-eavesdropping-for-dialogue/>)

That’s it. It really is a two-step process. It’s that easy. Get out there and give it a go, and if you hear something real, something strange, something funny; take note.

Beerwolf Books

This is an older piece from this time last year.


14:00/Monday/March

 

Pint: Chinook, 4.9% Hoppy £3.50

Memories of summer ’16 sound engineering a music festival in Suffolk.

 

Music: La La Land (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack)

Good film, average singing, excellent composition

Fits aesthetic (sun come out, blinds me for a second) of the pub

Walking bass prevalent, makes me think of the wood surrounding me.

By which I mean wooden tables everywhere, rickety wooden chairs, wood beams, banisters, flooring.

Good bit of song comes on and I shake my head to and fro. I look insane, I think.

I imagine dancing to A Lovely Night (the track currently playing) in this room, the tight spacing, choreographing tap on this board floor, the pub-laughter emerging from the surrounding tables. Pub-laughter is, of course, laughter reserved for within the warm, window-steaming confines of a public house.

This is where I realise the metal radiator is on beside me, I feel comfort. Not comfortable, but the sensation of comfort itself, from the heat, the wood finish, the hushed talk, the bebop coming through my right ear.

 

Sound: Pausing the music, taking the earbud out. The music had become sombre, as the album         was on shuffle, and some parts of La La Land are pretty sad (flash of light. Sun goes back     behind cloud).

I realise there is music playing ever so faintly in the background. Muzak. Lounge jazz, but, upon a closer listening, training the ear to cut above mumbled conversation, I identify drum breaks, trombones bopping. This is full jazz turned down painfully low.

Imagine the change in mood if the music took centre stage. If the band were live before me, on the slightly raised wooden stage which houses only a pinball machine and a man sat beneath a blue shaded light.

Would the mothers abandon their bottle of Pinot Grigio and dance? Or merely shuffle in their seats and smile at the younger men?

The sound of a coin hitting the floor, a familiar sound, but it lands side-on and begins to roll. Rolls. Rolls further, towards me away from the hipster couple with tea and bitter and a four-pack of cacti. I pick it up and the girl with the bangs comes to collect it in her faux-fur coat. These human interactions make a place like this. My heart rate increases by a few beats per minute. I am not used to communicating with strangers in bars. I am not cut out for this. I write it down. The forced smile fades from my lips.

 

Drink: I take a few gulps of the Chinook. I was lost in thought and this centres me.

Run my hands through my hair. Get my fingers locked in battle with a knot in my fringe. No one wins this game.

The woman in front of me finishes her glass of wine. It was full when I sat down with this hoppy brew and I’ve drank a third of my pint.

I wonder if she does this often? Is this a treat, a catch-up with her friends on a Monday afternoon or is this routine, ritual, habit?

Only one of the women still has some white left in her glass but — oh, the first to finish has topped everyone up. The bottle’s empty but she still replaces the lid; courtesy.

They talk in hushed tones and no one picks their glass up for some time as they discuss the intricacies of social media: “Snapchat? I barely get, no I’m not on it no.” “Why do [posts] never come up when you want to see them?” (my stubble is beginning to itch, I’ve been growing it out for five days and the edges are irritating me).

    

Break: I go to save this document, but cannot remember if Beerwolf Books is Beerwolf Books or     Beerwulf books. I go to pee. 

 

I peed. I sit.

 

Toilet: The back of the cubicle door contains multitudes. It is a blue painted wood. More wood.

The wood is dull, similar in colouration – beneath the paint – to the table.

I know this because of the messages carved on the door. (more light flashing)

QUICK POO? in the bottom left and underneath that NOPE THIS HAS BEEN AN EYE OPENING     JOURNEY

Elsewhere, not scratched in the door but topically applied in a blue pen: Pretty Girls Make     Cakes, but some other miscreant has scratched a line through Make Cakes and scribbled     beneath crudely COOK.

Apparently it is important to make the distinction between cooking and baking, as ‘pretty girls’ do one and not the other.

 

Beard: The hipster boy with the enviable beard has finished his pint. He is sitting on a wooden         chair at a table with the pretty girl who dropped the coin, but she is sitting on a leather sofa which dumps her gracelessly below him, to his right. They are both to my left. I can barely see her over the table at which she sits sipping her tea she is so low. She looks at him knowingly: he is facing away from me, towards her, so I can only see his ear piercing and the clean cut of his luscious facial hair.

 

Light: The light from the window directly in front of me, as you’ve noticed, keeps changing.

The sun goes from open to hidden frequently.

When I look at the window I see how dirty my glasses are.

I clean my glasses on my green polka-dotted shirt.

I look back up at the light and see it hasn't helped. I try on my coat sleeve but that does naught either. I’m simply moving smudge from one side of the lens to the other.

I hadn’t noticed before but a woman sits in the window the light shines through.

I can’t see her when it’s too bright, she becomes a silhouette, but when the sun hides she is fully formed with her hair tied up messily and glasses perched above her hairline. She’s beautiful, mirroring my movements typing away at her Mac and sipping her coffee.

I envy her.

She has a better seat than me and her cheekbones are highlighted by the sun.

She is everything I am not: illuminated, angular, lit.

 

Hands: The hipsters are holding hands.

I say holding hands, I more mean playing with each other’s hands.

He takes her hand in both of his and kisses it. I cannot help but smile.

He holds her wrist delicately, as if he might break it, and she lets her hand flop, flicking her fingers against his curled palm.

They are comfortable in each other’s presence.

I want a hold to hand.

Nope.

I want a hand to hold.

They’ve gone.

Looked around to see if the hipsters had left. Bartender catches my eye, leans his head down. He looks like a sitcom character staring direct to camera. He looks insane. I look insane.

 

Task: Someone else from class walks in, sits down, begins this task forty minutes behind me.

I try not to think of this as a task, as an assignment, or to discuss it.

That would make this piece more meta than I want it to.

The piece should be organically commenting on the process of writing about place.

Bugger.